Relevance has a half-life

A response can be right and still arrive after the need has changed. Relevance belongs to a moment, not just to the message.

The question

How does relevance decay, renew or change as a person's context moves?

Relevance is often treated as a property of the message, recommendation or offer. But relevance also belongs to a moment. Circumstances change. Intent moves. The reason someone was interested may no longer exist by the time the experience responds.

What we want to understand

  • How quickly different needs lose relevance.
  • Whether recent behaviour should always outweigh longer-term patterns.
  • How timing, frequency and relationship history affect perceived usefulness.
  • When a delayed response becomes intrusive, absurd or simply invisible.
  • How an experience can detect that a once-valid assumption has expired.

A working example

A customer searches for travel insurance during a short planning window. Two weeks later, the trip is cancelled. The system continues to serve increasingly confident recommendations based on a need that no longer exists.

The personalisation improves. The relevance disappears.


← Back to Discoveries